Mysteries of Inevitable Innocence: Is God Just in Allowing Innocent Infants to Die?

Throughout history, the question of why innocent infants are allowed to die has been a profound and often painful inquiry for many. It seems unjust that such young and innocent lives should be cut short, especially when they have nothing to do with free will or personal morality. This article delves into the reasoning behind God's seemingly arbitrary decisions concerning the fate of innocent infants and the complex questions that arise from His justice.

The Existence of Diseases and Natural Tragedies

Why do horrible diseases and natural disasters still exist in our world if God is a just and loving omnipotent being? It is a valid question to ask why innocent infants, who have done nothing to deserve their suffering, are born into such difficult situations. One possible explanation is rooted in the concept of free will and the vessels in which souls are housed.

Miraculously, certain individuals believe that the souls of those who may have faced early death are reincarnated into new vessels, preserving the continuity of the soul. For instance, if a miscarried child is considered to have a soul, it is believed that their spirit might be moved into another fetus or newborn. This idea is often juxtaposed with the controversial concept of infant damnation, which brings to light the inherent contradictions within religion.

Reincarnation and the Mystery of Life

From a spiritual perspective, the belief in reincarnation suggests that death is not an endpoint, but rather a transition. According to this view, the death of an innocent infant could be seen as their place in a larger cosmic plan. Perhaps they are considered too pure or good to remain in a physical world that is marred by sin and evil. It would be their divine destiny to return to their Creator in a more perfect form.

However, this belief system still faces the challenge of justifying the manner in which infants are often taken from life, either through miscarriages or in utero abortions. Critics argue that it would be illogical for God to condone such acts, as they involve the direct taking of innocent life.

God's Justice and Free Will

The concept of free will plays a crucial role in addressing the apparent injustice of infant mortality. If God granted us the power to choose, it may be to ensure that we have the ability to love and understand His intentions.

“Love is defined as ‘freely willing the good,’ and thus these creatures logically required free will.”

Proponents of this argument suggest that by allowing death, God is providing us with an opportunity to exercise our free will and make choices that reflect our understanding of His will. If God were to intervene and prevent all deaths, it would imply a violation of our free will, leading to a contradiction in His justice.

Counter-Argument and Free Will Defense

One possible counter-argument posits that if God were to create beings without the capacity to disobey, such individuals would be incapable of love. This would result in a universe devoid of free will, an assertion that many find untenable. According to this line of thinking, the act of creating beings with the potential for free will, including the capacity for love, is itself a reflection of God's perfection and justice.

Therefore, the argument goes that if God were to eliminate all instances of death, He would be compromising the essence of free will, which is fundamental to the nature of love and moral agency. This makes it a logical impossibility for God to create a world devoid of free will and death.

The ultimate conclusion is that God’s justice and love are interwoven in the mysterious fabric of existence. While the tragedy of infant mortality is a deep-seated grievance, it is also a testament to the complexities of human existence and the divine intent behind it.

Keywords: innocent babies, God’s justice, logical reasoning